The article states that schools in the Unıted States used a new system which was borrowed from European. This system base on grades by chronogical age method and provides three reasons of support. However, the Professor
explains that there are problems with the author's argument. The professor doesn't believe the benefits of the European system and refutes the author's reasons.
First, the reading states that all the students are exposed to a standart education at the same age. The professor refutes this point by stating that same standart education is not as pretty as the author believes. It should be base on differences because being mature can be different at the same age in terms of physically and mentality.
Second, the author argues that the student were able to repeat the school term if required. However, the professor contends that repeating the same school term would be boring for students, in consequence, İt may decrease the scores of the students.
Third, the reading avers that the evauation system such as exams is applied at the standart level throughout the school life. The lecture opposes this point by saying that the expectations of students vary from one to another.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s that schools in the Unıted States used a new system which was borrowed from Eur...
^^
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...base on grades by chronogical age method and provides three reasons of support. H...
^^
Line 2, column 43, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...plains that there are problems with the authors argument. The professor doesnt believe ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 75, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ith the authors argument. The professor doesnt believe the benefits of the European sy...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, third, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 198.0 270.72406181 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11616161616 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50312018329 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.2100539582 49.2860985944 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.0909090909 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177437025569 0.272083759551 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615296962223 0.0996497079465 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611091623493 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0857558144443 0.162205337803 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647796589043 0.0443174109184 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.