The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the percentages of students recorded at each of the four secondary school types available, namely specialist, grammar, voluntary-controlled and community schools in a period of 9 years, from 2000 to 2009. Overall, it can be seen that during the period the initial top option of voluntary-controlled schools witnessed a dramatical drop of its proportions, while community schools' percentages experienced a substantial increase.
To begin, voluntary-controlled schools seem to have been pupils' favourite option in 2000, as above half of them were studying there. At the same year, about one out of four students were attending grammar schools, while the percentages referring to specialist and community schools were relatively low.
In 2005, significant changes on the proportions of voluntary-controlled and community schools can be observed, with the former dropping to 38% and the later increasing by 20%, to 32%. On the other hand, the figures of the other types of institution remained approximately at the same level, experiencing a slight decrease in preference.
The trends were the same after 2005, with the percentages of community schools climbing to 58% whereas those regarding voluntary-controlled schools dropped to 20%, in 2009. In that year, the rest of the institutions of education were clearly less popular, with only one out of ten children attending a specialist school and 12% of pupils studying at grammar schools.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | Rizvi007 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | rose_3012 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | MaKay1990 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | harshiniharshini | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | harshiniharshini | 61 | view |
- The bar chart shows the number of times per week (in 1000s), over five weeks, that three computer packages were downloaded from the internet.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 and 1996 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations.Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by taxi 84
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, second, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5625 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.62900025588 2.65546596893 137% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.083217913 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.75 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147235073287 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737937038098 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470112273847 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096518706183 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313989940388 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.