in town and cities large malls should replace to the local shops. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, malls have become significant part of our society and replacing local shops in towns and cities. Some people agree that malls should replace local shops as it has all options and category products for customers. While others disagree on that as mall largely hamper the local business and essence of local market. I am inclined to believe that both has their own benefits. This essay will discuss both side of point and then I will give my opinion.
Firstly, Malls are mostly popular among working parents and youth due to their hectic life schedule thus they can shop everything like groceries, clothes, books etc under one roof along with cinemas and entertainment making it one-stop solution. People are also preferring this mall culture because it’s not only saves a lot of time of shopping but also saves lot of time of bargaining as things are available at fixed price. For example: Wall mart has all stuff under one roof with wholesale price so people do not need to rush to so many places to buy products.
Secondly, on contrary, malls have largely affected local market and economy by replacing local and small shops and taking away bread from the many mouths. The shopkeepers left with no means of earning for living. Only few customers who are neither aware of mall culture nor afford to go mall, opt to buy from small shops. For instance: Small shop near by my home has special place in my heart as it linked with my childhood favourite candy and cookie those made locally.
In conclusion, the forgoing discussion propounds the fact that undoubtedly malls have numerous advantages but depletion of small shops causing imbalance in economy which outweighs their benefits so in my opinion small shops should not be replaced by large shopping malls.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-21 | Daniel Torres | 77 | view |
- Tourism can bring jobs and money into struggling economies However some people argue that tourism should not be promoted in natural environments because of the harm it does Discuss your view and support with reasons and examples from your own experience o 88
- Gerontologists, people who study the process of ageing, are getting closer to finding a way to increase the human lifespan significantly. They claim that within the next few decades humans may be able to live for 500 years or more. Would living more 500 y 77
- Some people believe that war is the inevitable outcome where some believe that commerce and geopolitics have power to unite us. Discuss your view and support it with reasons/examples from your own experiences, observations or reading. 62
- A recent study has shown that over 50% of school children cannot write legibly. The researchers concluded that the widespread use of smartphones, tablets and computers by children from as young as 12 months old was to blame. We are now living in a “post 77
- A recent study has shown that over 50% of school children cannot write legibly. The researchers concluded that the widespread use of smartphones, tablets and computers by children from as young as 12 months old was to blame. We are now living in a “post 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ent making it one-stop solution. People are also preferring this mall culture because it's not...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...m small shops. For instance: Small shop near by my home has special place in my heart a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.926910299 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3846786366 2.71678728327 88% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 139.433497537 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624584717608 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4760356402 50.4703680194 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.076923077 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 7.25397266985 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2502180512 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910939238872 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948437567035 0.071462118173 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149659842308 0.151781067708 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0973203654946 0.0609392437508 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.