The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these cause affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The data given in the pie chart and the table depict the factors making land reduction and the percentages of land disappearing due to these factors on three particular areas on the world in 1990s.
Overall, it is clear evident that over-grazing, deforestation and over-cultivation were three main reasons causing less productive land. Europe was the area suffered the vastest total degradation, while North America had the smallest proportion.
It is noticeable that over-grazing made up the largest amount among 4 factors, at 35%. Additionally, that people cut a lot of tree in forests also occupied less than a third and over-farming was responsible for 28%. On the contrary, other reasons accounted for only 7%, which was the smallest figure.
Over-cultivation was the factor making the most enormous number of land degradation in North American, at 3.3%; whereas Oceania’s land was not destroyed by this factor. However, 11.3% land of Oceania, the highest figure in the table, was damaged by over-grazing which also made 5.5% land of Europe become less productive. The vastest number in total degradation belonged to Europe, the second rank was Oceania and America had the smallest acreage, at 23%, 13% and 5% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-13 | Vikuns | 73 | view |
| 2018-05-10 | Pham To Anh Dao | 78 | view |
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 56
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 61
- The internet has vastly increased our access to information. To what extent do you think this is a good thing? 61
- The plans below show a school library five years ago and the same library now 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
... on three particular areas on the world in 1990s. Overall, it is clear evident that ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h America had the smallest proportion. It is noticeable that over-grazing made ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, second, so, third, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31979695431 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08493324245 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61421319797 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3341827967 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.444444444 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166478812418 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685012622461 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783662188518 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114160429236 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713166775094 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.