Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more import than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Besides our parents, teachers are arguably the most influential figures guiding us through our formative years. Some believe that having excellent subject knowledge is less import than the way the teacher relates to the students at a personal level. This essay will discuss why it is, in fact, a teacher’s ability to relate well with his or her students that is more important than subject matter expertise.
Contrary to the belief that teachers need to be experts in their subjects, evidence shows that students actually learn more when they like their teacher. We want to impress people we like. So when student likes a teacher, they also want the teacher to like them. For example, evidence shows that this is linked to longer attention spans an to higher levels of student motivation. So, having a teacher they like, means that students will put in the effort to make sure they don’t disappoint their teacher.
Secondly, students feel more comfortable with a teacher they can relate to and therefore, they will be more open to learning. Further evidence for this is that teachers are not just there to impart academic knowledge, but also to support their student’s mental and emotional development. For instance, teachers who relate well to their students will be more successful in reaching their students on a deeper level as students will be more willing to approach them if they have an academic or personal problem. This supports the idea that the best learning happens in a supportive environment. Therefore, providing this is more important than expert knowledge.
This essay discussed how a well liked teacher can improve educational performance, open students up to learning more and make learning more enjoyable. In conclusion, in my view, when it comes to teachers, knowledge is subordinate to the real teaching skill which is being personable and likeable.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-05-17 | hughesmiao | 71 | view |
2018-05-17 | hughesmiao | 70 | view |
2018-05-17 | hughesmiao | 66 | view |
2018-05-16 | hughesmiao | 68 | view |
2018-05-16 | hughesmiao | 71 | view |
- When parents cannot afford time to accompany with their children, they could choose to send their children to child-care center where many children are cared together; or they could send their children to an individual caregiver. Which one is better? 100
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Eventually, all jobs will be done by artificially intelligent robots. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more import than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 71
- People can solve important problems by themselves or with the help from their family members so there is no need for the government to help them 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...his is linked to longer attention spans an to higher levels of student motivation....
^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...re, they will be more open to learning. Further evidence for this is that teachers are ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 307.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17915309446 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73651696088 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547231270358 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3323529306 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284293201296 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107921390739 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791687500131 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191512158164 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845476149278 0.0645574589148 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.