A glance at the chart provided illustrates the data on the times the Australian teenagers use junk food during the period from 1975 to 2000.
It is obvious that the number of times eaten fish and chips declined significantly. On the other hand, there was a steep rise in times of pizza and hamburgers consumption over 25 years.
In the first year, 1975, the most popular convenient food of Australian young was fish and chips. They were consumed 100 times a year. It was the highest level in that period while pizza and hamburgers were only eaten approximately 5 times a years. There was a considerable fluctuation in the number of times eaten fish and chips between 1975 and 1985. Then, it decreased dramatically about 60 times during the 15 years timescale.
Differently from fish and chips, the number of times used the other two fast food were extremely low at first. However, afterwards, they went up sharply until 1995. In the ultimate five years, they stayed at the same level after growth. Specially, the number of times eaten hamburgers achieved the maximum level which was similar to fish and chips in 1975 with consumption at 100 times a year.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Tuấn Tài
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a year' or simply 'years'?
Suggestion: a year; years
...s were only eaten approximately 5 times a years. There was a considerable fluctuation i...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58696733648 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5166623954 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102760587628 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441821597809 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581300176453 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0798846130087 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647885327056 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.