The charts below show the percentage of water use for different purposes in six areas of the world.
The data given in the pie charts compare how people use water according to three different purposes in six parts of the world.
Overall, it is clear that Europeans and North American use mostly water for industry while the four remaining utilize water for farmland. On the contrary, the use of water in production made up the smallest part in these four areas.
It is noticeable that there is the most significant amount of water used for agriculture in Central Asia, at 88%; whereas 5% and 7% are the percentages of water people consume on industry and household respectively. Africa and South East Asia residents also use water in farmland dramatically, at 84% and 81% separately. Nevertheless, the proportions of water used for agriculture in North America and Europe are much lower than that of these four parts, both of them are under 40%.
Besides, the use of water for industry makes up approximately a half in North America and Europe. By the contrast, this water usage in the rest places occupies just under a quarter. Similarly, house chores consume small proportions of water in six areas, they are all under 20%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-06 | viashav thakur | view |
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 84
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 56
- The charts below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 84
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give opinions. 56
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give opinions. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, nevertheless, similarly, so, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91666666667 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69964552071 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578125 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8831626964 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.888888889 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345801141417 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143718574251 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832962782146 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223446877653 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705112436721 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.