Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
Considering the argument that "Palean" baskets are found in Lithos which were considered as not unique to prehistoric village of Palea. There are so many ways by which baskets may have reached the across the river onto the land of Lithos. And so the woven baskets which were found on Lithos's land cannot be considered as originally from Palea only.
Some people may have be frequent travllers between Lithos and Palea and carried the baskets from Palaea to Lithos in the form of gifts for the relatives living in Lithos inferring that baskets were originally from Palea. While there is a possiblity that some sellers were selling these baskets on the Land of Palea to gain some money because they were considering the baskets as well woven and characterized. If considering the assumption that the number of baskets found on the land of Lithos were very much less than that of found in Palea then these baskets may have reached the bank of Lithos while floating through it and then people of LIthos may have learned the technique to copy the basket which was originally form Palea.
Also there is possiblity that some of the workers who were skilled in making these baskets had been moved to the Lithos for some reasons and then wove these baskets there for the rest of the life. Along with making these baskets artists who knew the technique to wove these beautiful baskets may have taught to the people living in Lithos resulting in Lithos manufacturing these baskets. We cannot ignore the assumption that people from Lithos may have travelled to the Palea and learned the skill to make these baskets and then returned again to their homeland.
As going through the above argument one cannot depict that baskets were uniquely belonged to Palea. Even though they had belonged to, Lithos may have very well adopted the technique to make these baskets by their own.
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 43
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal.A new study of a colony of meerkats provides insights into the effects of dominance on a malemeerkat’s levels of testosterone. The study showed that the dominant male of th 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: While there is a possiblity that some sellers were selling these baskets on the Land of Palea to gain some money because they were considering the baskets as well woven and characterized.
Error: possiblity Suggestion: possibility
Sentence: Also there is possiblity that some of the workers who were skilled in making these baskets had been moved to the Lithos for some reasons and then wove these baskets there for the rest of the life.
Error: possiblity Suggestion: possibility
---------------------
flaws:
the arguments are not exactly right on the point. minimum 3 arguments wanted.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 321 350
No. of Characters: 1528 1500
No. of Different Words: 132 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.233 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.76 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.252 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 102 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 68 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 34 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29.182 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.511 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.818 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.512 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.707 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.224 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 22, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... from Palea only. Some people may have be frequent travllers between Lithos and P...
^^
Line 2, column 720, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'formed'.
Suggestion: formed
...to copy the basket which was originally form Palea. Also there is possiblity that s...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...asket which was originally form Palea. Also there is possiblity that some of the wo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...m Palea. Also there is possiblity that some of the workers who were skilled in making thes...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... then returned again to their homeland. As going through the above argument one ca...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 55.5748502994 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 16.3942115768 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 2260.96107784 69% => OK
No of words: 321.0 441.139720559 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85046728972 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38565017415 2.78398813304 86% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 204.123752495 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.398753894081 0.468620217663 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 492.3 705.55239521 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.76447105788 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.8473053892 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.0999469555 57.8364921388 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.545454545 119.503703932 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1818181818 23.324526521 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.70786347227 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199285260224 0.218282227539 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102468803223 0.0743258471296 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329267578082 0.0701772020484 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140809214999 0.128457276422 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391078585209 0.0628817314937 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.3799401198 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.3550499002 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.197005988 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.5979740519 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 98.500998004 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.1389221557 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.