The charts below show information on crime in the US for 2002. Write a report for a universal lecturer describing the information below.
As can be seen, the line graph displays the trend regarding the correlation between age and the amount of criminality in the UK 2002, while the pie chart illustrates the proportion of different offences in the UK.
Clearly, there is a noticeable high point of offences during the adolescent period among the age groups in 2002. Besides, the inmates were classified into 4 types by different convictions.
In 2002, the criminality began showing up at the age of 8, followed by an appalling upsurge to 70% at the age of 16. The conviction rate then climbed to a record high of 80% at the age of 20; thereafter, the rate immediately turned down remarkably all the way to 20%. Remaining a steady decline from the age of 28 to the age of 60, the percentages finally became lower than 10%.
The pie chart provided the proportions and different reasons why the prisoners were in jail in the UK in 2002. The four divided categories included violent crimes, property crime, drug crime and public order crime. It is obvious that the crime type accounting for the highest portion was up to 40% -- the prisoners of this type were violent offenders. The second and the third largest portions were those who were convicted of property and drug criminalities at 23% and 22% respectively. The smallest part was conviction for public order crime at 9%.
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 75
- The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the US and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system. 78
- The table below shows the estimated oil capacity of six countries, in millions of barrels per day, from 1990 to 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Given are two pie charts displaying the categories of the annual spending divided by families in Canada between 1972 and 2002. 78
- The graph beside shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, if, regarding, second, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1114.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80172413793 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75374653319 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581896551724 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1237653912 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.272727273 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108228689328 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044219706314 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401649152972 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0550387801991 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413301345557 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.