Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to spend your money on an object that will last a long time than it is to spend your money on an experience (such as a vacation, concert, etc.) that will last only a short time. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Spending or saving money play a vital role in our life. One of the most important aspects of our life is economical issues, so we should balance our incomes and expenditures to have a comfortable life. Some may believe that spending money on the objects that will last a long time is better than spending it on a short time lasting experience. Personally, I prefer to spend my money on long-lasting objects for two reasons.
The main reason is that when I buy an object that will last a long time, I can use or sell it in some emergency conditions. Long-Lasting objects remain for me, and it is mine that I can benefit from it whenever I want. In addition, some of these objects have an ability to be sold everywhere and every time. For example 5 years ago, we migrated to Tehran, and rent a house in the center of the city. After Some days, one of our apartment units was bought by a family. Unfortunately, after four months, we were informed that the mother of that family has a breast cancer. They had not enough money to cure her; they had only a unit of an apartment. Finally, they sold their unit, so with the money they had been earned they could remedy the mother of the family. As you can see if they did not have that home they could not handle the expenditures of the hospital.
Another reason is that when I have an object that will remain for me, I could enjoy it more than some temporal experiences. Logical Connection. For instance, I have a friend that was my high school classmate. He likes travelling a lot and spends too much money on his public transportation, especially airplane. But I have saved my income, so I could recently buy an automobile, and I decided to travel with my family to Persian Gulf islands like Kish and Qeshm. I used my car for this travel, so I could stop in each city where is between Tehran and our destination. Also, we had this opportunity to see the beauties of the road and nature. This experience taught me that the objects which I can enjoy with it are suitable for me.
In sum, I prefer to spend my money for long-lasting objects instead of some short time experiences. Not only these objects will benefit me in emergency conditions but also can be more enjoyable for me in every time and everywhere. It is better for us to manage our expenditures for vital stuff in life in order to have a good future for ourselves and descendants.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-17 | Fateme.J | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-17 | Fateme.J | 70 | view |
| 2019-09-17 | mohammadkmi | 3 | view |
| 2018-08-08 | theresa_trangnguyen | 3 | view |
| 2018-08-08 | theresa_trangnguyen | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to spend your money on an object that will last a long time than it is to spend your money on an experience (such as a vacation, concert, etc.) that will last only a short time. Use speci 70
- Many people visit museums when they travel to new places. Why do you think people visit museums? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...e most important aspects of our life is economical issues, so we should balance our income...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
...es to have a comfortable life. Some may believe that spending money on the objects that...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, may, so, for example, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 76.0 43.0788530466 176% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62291239303 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477272727273 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 639.0 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5609591182 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1304347826 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1304347826 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.08695652174 5.45110844103 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288907631193 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910154012678 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113724347046 0.0737576698707 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201710706925 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080064784131 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.