The pie chart depicts the one year expenditures and revenue sources information of children's charity located in the USA. Noticeably, the money spent on various activities is received from different resources,expenditures and revenue sources are not having major difference.
It is evident from chart, large portion of revenue resources is from food Donation, on the other hand , lots of expenditures is on program services. The community contributions and program revenue accounts 10.4% and 2.2% respectively of total Revenue sources, the share from other incomes is around 0.4%. As is presented the revenue provided by government is very low, its proportion is only 0.2 % same as that of Investment income. Most of money is spent on service program , funding accounts 2.6% . Interestingly charity spends only 1.6% for its Management and General.
To Recapitulate, most of money was used for program services and food donation was the major revenue resource. Management expenses are very less, hence the money can be optimally used for other activities.
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The bar graph below shows the numbers of employed persons by job type and sex for Australia in the year 2003. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The bar graph below shows the numbers of male and female research students studying six computer science subjects at a US university in 2011. 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. Percentage of national consumer expenditure by category - 2002 56
- The Bar graph bellow shows the Expenditure in Million Pounds on fast food items by income groups in UK. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The pie chart depicts the one year expenditures and revenue sources informa...
^^
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , expenditures
...ies is received from different resources,expenditures and revenue sources are not having majo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...is from food Donation, on the other hand , lots of expenditures is on program serv...
^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ervices. The community contributions and program revenue accounts 10.4% and 2.2%...
^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ions and program revenue accounts 10.4% and 2.2% respectively of total Revenue s...
^^
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ost of money is spent on service program , funding accounts 2.6% . Interestingly c...
^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... service program , funding accounts 2.6% . Interestingly charity spends only 1.6% ...
^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r program services and food donation was the major revenue resource. Management e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47852760736 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17459030326 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613496932515 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9235197168 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2222222222 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197447084574 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903343447468 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124713428042 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155366485714 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141931703394 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.