Whether design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of constructing new buildings with the particular design or renovating the old ones and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of architectural features is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that an impressive building can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, building infrastructure can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of a luxury apartment, as well as the interior designer, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the decorating job opportunities, the handmade goods and the contemporary art. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the modern lifestyles and positive work opportunities apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, building design might increase the consequences of physical health problems. Moreover, fundamental aspects of a modern construction could relate to this reality that the demerits of working at a high level pertain to physical damages such as hand broken, falling fear and head injuries. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the high ceiling is correlated negatively with low ventilation. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of a property developer.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the design of the building far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a modern building prove the significance of equal opportunities, but also pinpoint luxurious life implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-13 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
| 2018-06-13 | dhavalpatel095 | 77 | view |
| 2018-06-13 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
| 2018-06-13 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
| 2018-06-13 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
- Should digital media replace textbooks? what are the reviews and possible solutions. 88
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options and give examples. 85
- Global problems related to governments and international organizations, what are the problems and what is your opinion? 11
- If you are assigned to work on a study on climate change, what will you choose to focus on and why? 11
- Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60616438356 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35959253208 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 139.433497537 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643835616438 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6656560831 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.416666667 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158189619016 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506214471766 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03334306937 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0874109649463 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267938946477 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.