Students at schools and universities learn more from lessons with teachers than from others sources (such as the Internet or television). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is irrefutable that myriad of information is available nowadays on different resources as compared to past time. Advocates are of the view that pupils grasp more when mentor teaches them the study related topics as compared to Digital Network. I strongly agree with this point of view and this essay intends to delve into this phenomenon in following paragraphs.
To commence with, teachers can provide selective information according to the level of child and make them understand in a better way. As Mentors have experience of so many years in their profession and also, they know about the capabilities of each child; therefore, teachers can impart the knowledge in a better way as compared to the internet or television. Also, lecturers knows the students strengths and weaknesses. Consequently, they can guide the students in the career decision making. For instance, a recent study by Human Resource Department of Oxford University reveals that students with their guide involved in their job selection criteria are 70 percent more successful as compared to their counterpart. Therefore, a mentor plays a imperative role in the upbringing of pupils.
Furthermore, a guide is the best medium to imbibe moral values in the children. As students spent most of their time in schools and colleges; therefore, teachers as considerable influence to teach the pupils about respecting their parents and elderly people which is the best gift for greying society. Additionally, these rewarding etiquettes help the offspring in future to imbibing good habits in their child. To justify this, in countries like Canada, personal traits and behavior of the interviewing candidate has forty percent marks as good employer always looks for employees who are honest and loyal to the company. Therefore, teachers are the best resources to prepare the regarding future for nation.
To recapitulate, the aforementioned statements provide plausible arguments in favour of mentors and coaches as compared to digital media. Therefore, internet and televisions cannot replace the traditional way of teaching.
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.Why do you think this is happening?What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced. 84
- You recently went on a trip with a friend and you both took some photographs.Write a letter to your friend. In your letterask your friend, to send you one of the photographsexplain why you need that particular photographtell your friend what happened to y 73
- some people think that having a set retirement age for everybody, regardless of occupation is unfair. They believe that certain worker deserve to retire and receive a pension at an earlier ageDo you agree or disagree?which type of workers do you think sho 84
- Some people think that economic progress is the only way to measure a country’s success, while others think that there are other factors which can be used to measure a country’s success. What are these factors? And among them, which one is more import 79
- Write a letter to neighbour about the garbage problem you have Introduce yourself Explain the problem Provide appropriate solution 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...s on different resources as compared to past time. Advocates are of the view that pupils ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 746, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... counterpart. Therefore, a mentor plays a imperative role in the upbringing of pu...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, as for, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43425076453 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94282729543 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574923547401 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.790046443 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0625 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103049471397 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0314626824138 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0276414377213 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0573318135597 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222248307761 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.