The overgrowth in use of private vehicles in traffic nowadays has made an atrocious impact to the environment, which directly leads to global warming problem. Hence, in order to solve the issue, several ideas have been sorted out. While some people support in upgrading public transportation system, others agree with exploring an innovation for clean energy cars. I tend to think that it will be a great advance for governments to invest in public transports aspect.
It cannot be denied that produce new generation cars with a big support from high technology is a promising solution. However, this project has several disadvantages besides, which should all be put in consider. First, the initial cost for operation a new car product is high and also, the length of time it requires to research. Furthermore, changing the customer’s mind has always been a daunting task, not just with buying vehicles.
On the other hand, public transports may not require much investment from the government. It will play a key role in the reduction of fuel supply, since it becomes mainstream in traffic. Besides, it also decreases the needs for vast car park. Nevertheless, urban transportation service still exists several negative effects and one of the must-say issue is the time-consuming. The goal of any types of public transports is to carry as high load of human as possible but somehow, in some stops, many people are late for their scheduled plan due to the lack of trains. Another minus point for public transports is its non-flexibility. Specifically, it would be hard for tourists to enjoy their explorations because of jumping too much series of train. Governments should pay more attentions to reorganize the public stops to be more affordable.
In short, public transports tend to be more promising than private vehicles, due to those conveniences mentioned above.
- the chart below gives information on the percentage of british people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- All children should study a foreign language, starting in the earliest grades. To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement ? 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 84
- All children should study a foreign language, starting in the earliest grades. To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement ? 61
- The charts below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1990, 2000, and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 318, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'researching'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: researching
...nd also, the length of time it requires to research. Furthermore, changing the customer&apo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 729, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...eir explorations because of jumping too much series of train. Governments should pay...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, while, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16393442623 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97652916669 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626229508197 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.257935372 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6470588235 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9411764706 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29411764706 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226989041764 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664337368741 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501898530257 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127198868256 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06160891948 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.