the graph below changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 to 2011
Given is a line graph illustrating the figure for the average price of food and oil in the world over the period of 11 years since 2000. In general, it is evident that average price of both food and oil rose strongly between 2000 and 2011. Besides, the number of food price reached the peak in the year 2011, and that of oil price was the highest in 2008.
In the year 2000, the average global oil price was close to $25 per barrel, and the food price stood at just under 90 points. Over the following 4 years, both prices remained stable, before rising steadily between 2004 and 2007. A dramatic increase in both commodity prices was seen from 2007 to 2008, with oil prices reaching the peak of approximately $130 per barrel and the number on food price rocketing to 220 points. However, the figure for oil dropped dramatically in 2009, and this year, that of food price witnessed a huge decrease. Finally, in 2011, the average oil price rose once again, to nearly $110 per barrel, while the food price index peaked at almost 240 points.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-09 | Estriper | view |
- What, in your opinion, is the reason for this? How can this be balanced?Give reasons for your answer. 73
- Some people regard to video games as harmless fun, or even as a useful education tool. Other, however, believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them. In your opinion, do the drawbacks of video game outweigh benefits. 61
- the graph below changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 to 2011 73
- Some people believe that living in big cities is becoming more difficult. Others believe that it is getting easier. Discuss both view and give your own opinion. 56
- The pie below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, however, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48148148148 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18090848134 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529100529101 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.83281573 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.875 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423517503994 0.215688989381 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.222512367656 0.103423049105 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824395377758 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.381617133556 0.15604864568 245% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563302928066 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.