TPO 37
The reading passage claims that turtle excluder device or TED is one of the most important solutions to recover turtles' population, which are threated by shrimps-fishing boats. But this method has been criticized for many reasons. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author holds the view that hardly turtle get trapped by shrimp fishers and fishers complain about staggering costs of TED because the cost of losing one shrimp is higher than saving one turtle. In contrast, the lecturer brings up the idea that there are vast majorities of shrimp boats in the ocean, so, they may individually and accidentally trap a turtle but the population of a turtle as a whole will diminish drastically.
The author also asserts that shrimps boats should shorten the time of nets keeping under water, which is a more reliable method than TED. On the contrary, the professor underlines the idea that it is possible only in the theory because it is impossible to enforce in the real world. In fact, the government will not be able to control the time of nets keeping underwater. So, this could not be an effective way to save the turtle.
Finally, as set forth by the author TED is not effective for larger turtles. Indeed, some species of turtles are larger that cannot escape through the passage. Conversely, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that TED's design could be modified easily and quickly and it could be no longer a serious problem. SO, by changing the method, the problem of larger species could be solved vigorously.
Having scrutinized all the premises, a logical conclusion that can be drawn is that there are pieces of evidence having been ignored by the author while the presence of which could strengthen the author's claim.
- Over the past year the Crust Copper Company CCC has purchased over 10 000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia Mining copper on this land will inevitably result in pollution and since West Fredonia is the home of several endangered 63
- A company is going to give some money either to support arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the company should choose? 73
- Do you agree or disagree that progress is always good? 86
- Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. do you agree or disagree? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, may, so, then, while, in contrast, in fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92556634304 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53746036081 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559870550162 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6476365517 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.714285714 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.