online and traditional encyclopedias
The text is explaining disadvantage of online encyclopedias and provides some reasons why they are not reliable and good sources for research. On the other hand, the professor goes against them and explains how important online encyclopedias are and gives some discussion in this regard.
Firstly, the text explains that online encyclopedias often are not reliable and have a deep lack on having academic credential, on the other hand traditional encyclopedias are more accurate. The professor goes against this claim and says that, if we are looking for a source which has not any kind of error, we never ever can find it. She believes, however, there are some errors in online encyclopedias, but it is easier to correct them compared to errors in traditional encyclopedias and if there be an error in a traditional encyclopedia, it will remain for decades but it is not the same in online encyclopedias.
Secondly, the text claims that even if we accept that base knowledge of online encyclopedias are true, they are in a serious threat of hackers and users of online encyclopedias cannot even know what errors might an online encyclopedia have. The professor refutes this point by saying that, there is a good protection against hacking treats and also online encyclopedias can use some especial formats which are not editable and this will eliminate this chance that online encyclopedias be edited by other people.
Thirdly, the text says that online encyclopedias pay too deep attention and focus on all different fields. It says that, in online encyclopedias, common topic and be shown as important as a serious topic. But the professor refutes this claim and says that, online encyclopedias provide this chance for us to know about anything which is worth to know and traditional encyclopedias based on their limited space have to decide what topic is important and what is not. so we do not have access to all topics. In this way, they do not pay attention to people's interest and it is while online encyclopedias publish any kind of topics and no one decides about the importance of the topics and diversity of the topics in online encyclopedias is one of their greatest advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-26 | Uttama Shekhawat | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-14 | ManishAdh | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 88 | view |
| 2019-02-27 | sara.87 | 81 | view |
| 2018-06-25 | nastaran1992 | 73 | view |
- evidences which show were Pterosaurs able to fly or not 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 70
- the effect of agriculture on the population of birds 73
- television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. 70
- how people accept facts 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 467, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...hat topic is important and what is not. so we do not have access to all topics. In...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 7.30242825607 288% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 1373.03311258 134% => OK
No of words: 366.0 270.72406181 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01912568306 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95173660111 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44262295082 0.540411800872 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 598.5 419.366225166 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.4364883128 49.2860985944 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.083333333 110.228320801 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 21.698381199 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.505302243375 0.272083759551 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.2135564165 0.0996497079465 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130331304836 0.0662205650399 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.347715006047 0.162205337803 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689246536112 0.0443174109184 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.3589403974 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.