The three pie chart shows the changes in annual spending by particular uk school in 1981 , 1991 , 2001
the provided three circcircular layouts demonstrate the variation came in expenses of London school in specific three years:1981, 1991 and 2001. the data is in percentum which is represented lucidly.
As it can be observed, in 1981 spending on books was less than a fifth which rose in next two decades. however, on furniture and equipment school was spending 15% of cash which suffered downfall of one tenth in 1991 nevertheless, surging to less than quarter. Moreover, investment on insurance by school had been boosting annually reaching to 8% in 2001.
Likewise, maximum expenditure had noticed in teachers payments. As in1981, two fifth of spending went to teachers which became half of the total after a decade, and decreased by negligible percentum. similarly, salaries paid to workers occupied only 28% of school expenditure. which suffered continues decline in year 1991 and in 2001 was less than fifth.
Overall, maximum spending was on teachers salary whereas least expenses were in workers pays. In insurance section the spending went on increasing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-28 | gagandeepkaurhundal | 78 | view |
- Some people say that computer games are bad for children by all means while others believe that these games are contributing to children development 89
- The three pie chart shows the changes in annual spending by particular uk school in 1981 , 1991 , 2001 78
- Some people say that computer games are bad for children by all means while others believe that these games are contributing to children development 89
- Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages 89
- The diagram shows life cycle of the silkworm and stages in the production of silk cloth 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the provided three circcircular layouts dem...
^^^
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ecific three years:1981, 1991 and 2001. the data is in percentum which is represent...
^^^
Line 2, column 103, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...a fifth which rose in next two decades. however, on furniture and equipment school was ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Similarly
... and decreased by negligible percentum. similarly, salaries paid to workers occupied only...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...ccupied only 28% of school expenditure. which suffered continues decline in year 1991...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed continues decline in year 1991 and in 2001 was less than fifth. Overall, maxi...
^^
Line 4, column 34, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ifth. Overall, maximum spending was on teachers salary whereas least expenses were in w...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, moreover, nevertheless, similarly, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30177514793 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84409255032 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603550295858 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1926965282 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4545454545 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3636363636 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223817478147 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796913664989 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688852509215 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138594415887 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605877566826 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.