The flowchart shows that various stages production of pears as canned fruits.
Overall, it is a scientific process which involves the various step and equipments are used in it.
After a carefull analysis, in the first stage, the pears are picked by hand. Then, they are transported for the washing processs. After that, the quality is checked of the pears fruit. Then they are stored in the cold storage. They are weighted by the machine. Then, the grading is done. In the next stage, the fruits are peeled by cutter into the amall piece.
As far as trend is concerned, the fruit is cored and sliced into the pieces. Then, they are cored in the boxes and the boxes are sealed. In the further stage, the pears fruit is cooked and sterlized to prtec there from gems. Then, they are labelled. In the last two steps, the fruit is stored and then dispatched in the market.
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia’s share of the Japanese tourist market.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 73
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons 85
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The diagram describes the production of canned fruit. 56
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'stages'' or 'stage's'?
Suggestion: stages'; stage's
The flowchart shows that various stages production of pears as canned fruits. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 722.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62820512821 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20807048787 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532051282051 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.4240213765 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 51.5714285714 112.824112599 46% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.1428571429 22.9334400587 49% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.07142857143 5.23603664747 20% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.09268292683 318% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139395056077 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453861557973 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581496155402 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0894452328205 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692524649298 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.9 13.2329268293 45% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.69 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.0 10.3012195122 39% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.39 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 11.4329268293 35% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 4.0 11.0658536585 36% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.