people who are the most deeply committed to an idea or a policy are also the most critical of it. do you agree or disagree?
The author of the issue highlights that people who believe their ideas thoroughly and deeply are the most critical of them. Due to the controversial nature of this question, there is not a general argument on this issue. However, the popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling is that human beings take their interests and believes into consideration when it comes to ideas and opinions because they might hardly be the commitment to their ideas. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.
To commence with, there is no doubt that people have always persisted on their own personal ideas and advocated them vigorously. Broadly speaking, although individuals might be committed to any given fact, they are more likely to take some benefits into account when persisting on an issue. As a palpable example, religious people are inclined toward the opinion that God created everything and their lives belong to God. Indeed, this idea is their own belief and they never want to be critical of it owing to the fact that it has been accepted as a belief for a long time. To elucidate more on this issue, when people grow with their belief, hardly can anyone change their ideas due to the fact that they intrinsically persist on their own personal opinions.
Another equally salient point in corroborating my stance is that despite the fact that people know they should be critical of their own belief, they incredibly prefer to think of their own profits and interests. If we take a minute to ponder over it, interests and incomes inhibit people from being committed and critical of their own ideas. For instance, a company that produces some tablets for different diseases is cognizant of tablets' prone and cons. But the company prefer not to say anything about tablets because clarifying the vagueness might create some problem for the company. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that in today's hectic city of life, hardly people pay attention to their commitments because they prefer to stay focus on their interests.
However, what was alluded to above can't be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside the innumerable benefits it has, indisputably, if people want to be critical of their own belief, they should be knowledgeable and self-sufficient. For example, doctors are knowledgeable and experienced people who are aware of different consequences which drugs have. So, they are able to give the best idea because they know whether they have to be critical of their own ideas or not.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-03 | amirbahman | 66 | view |
- In order to be well informed a person must get information from many different news resources 87
- What change would make your hometown more appealing to people your age? 70
- The president of Grove College has recommended that the college abandon its century-old tradition of all-female education and begin admitting men. Pointing to other all-female colleges that experienced an increase in applications after adopting coeducatio 38
- people do many tasks to improve their natural environment. which of the following tasks do you prefer and why?1. plant trees and make parks2. using fewer plastic bags when shopping3. use public transportation 73
- alpaca overcoat 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
.... However, what was alluded to above cant be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alo...
^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, broadly speaking, for example, for instance, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2234.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97550111359 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70737956658 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492204899777 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3069555544 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.578947368 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6315789474 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94736842105 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144029886056 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538810591831 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678578414642 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794945402723 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445841165297 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.