As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
The statement emphasizing the negative effect of technology on humans’ ability to think has been concerned since the birth of the digital technology. High-tech like computers can outperform humans in various tasks in a trice. A transporting vehicle like an autonomous car can take people to places without much human interference. A simple software that is able to correct spellings in a document certainly curtails the effort to avoid these mistakes. It is evidently more obvious to ordinary people that technology fulfills a demand before human discover one. All these conveniences of technology deceptively rejected the need for people to think for themselves. In a contrary, the invention of advanced products branches new pathways to more innovative ideas as opposed to limited thinking.
Before the advent of the digitalized century, development in technology did not arrest at the machines that ran on steams and electricity. Despite the fact that technology at the time already provided a better life, the human was not complacent for the accessibility. People could obtain information worldwide from the screen of a television but sought methods to store and process this information for future reference. Tourists could travel to a distant city in a steam-engine train in a few days but explored materials and resources to expedite the transport speed. Professionals could write a long article effortlessly using type-writers but desire an assistant to suggest correct spelling before making a mistake. In the history of human advancement, improving the current technology for a better life drives the human to think broadly and deeply about existing needs. The creation of technology does not impede human to think but evokes more brainchild.
However, the appearance of new tools does not only stimulate new ideas but also introduces more issues. In other words, there would be more problems to tackle with the evolution of technology. Although the first computer produced in the 19th century accomplished storing information that was beyond human’s expectation, the physical size of the machine was ginormous, and engineers started to explore approaches to shrink the hardware. The burgeon of fuel-engine vehicles exacerbated the pollution to the environment on a global scale, and it elicited the urge for a clean energy. Software like Grammarly redefined the mechanism to amend articles that account for the grammatical error as well as the spelling error and more development conducted on identifying structural and sentiment improvements. The problems accompanying the production of technology cannot be solved unless human appreciate the ability to think answers.
Furthermore, technology is only a fraction of human life, we think on many questions raised from all aspects of our lives. Apart from generating techniques to store information, human discover new media to disseminate the information through words, paintings, motion pictures. Besides traveling to places, human learn how to embellish themselves in a wide variety of clothes and present themselves in a fashioned manner. In addition to correct their own mistakes, human tends to think of how to improve themselves and build up the strength to confront and overcome the difficulties in their lives. It cannot be more apparent that only a fraction of human’s mind work on the problems of technology and a majority of the thinking will not be impeded by the backwater in technology.
Technology will always be episodes and only part of the human history. The ability to think for human will only be energized by the growth of technology to find the solutions to the concomitant issues. More importantly, human’s thinking is eclectic and will not be curbed by simply applying it on a single facet of life. Never stop thinking is the bedrock of today’s achievement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 442, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...lore approaches to shrink the hardware. The burgeon of fuel-engine vehicles exacerbated the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 399, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a fashioned manner" with adverb for "fashioned"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...riety of clothes and present themselves in a fashioned manner. In addition to correct their own mist...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he bedrock of today's achievement.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, apart from, in addition, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 99.0 58.6224719101 169% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3277.0 2235.4752809 147% => OK
No of words: 606.0 442.535393258 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40759075908 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96155895361 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07563181316 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 313.0 215.323595506 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516501650165 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 1045.8 704.065955056 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5895319881 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8965517241 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.93103448276 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0112159203064 0.243740707755 5% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00347958018344 0.0831039109588 4% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0102511640219 0.0758088955206 14% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00701901110372 0.150359130593 5% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00950972804676 0.0667264976115 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 197.0 100.480337079 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.