To some people studying the past is the best to help young people function well in the modern world To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures could be effective in helping young people to function well in the modern world

Studying the past certainly plays an important, if not the most important role in helping young people deal with today's world.
There can be no doubt that studying history can help young people to operate in the present world.For example, studying history of the own country not only gives the pride in their own history and culture, but an understanding of why the business, financial or legal systems work as they do. They can then learn to judge what to protect and what to change. Learing history can also help prevent people from making mistakes by showing them how events develop and mistakes occur, thus enabling them to avoid pitfalls in their lives.
Although studying history is beneficial, it is not enough on its own. There are other approaches that are almost as important in helping young people. Travelling informs the young about the world around them. Take educational exchanges between countries like Russia and the UK, for example. In such exchanges, learning about the culture and history, the ways of doing things as well as learning the language take place. These, in turn, help young people deal with people from other countries as well.
Another measures is to make sure that all young people are equipped for the digital skills to study and find work in a highly competitive world. Even with these skills, an understanding that comes from a study of culture and history both national is still needed, to survive and not make the mistakes of the past.
In conclusion, while there are obviously different ways to help people deal with modern life, an awareness of the past is probably the best means of doing so.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (7 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 99, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
... people to operate in the present world.For example, studying history of the own co...
^^^
Line 4, column 19, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...r countries as well. Another measures is to make sure that all young people are ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, then, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87813620072 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37495702233 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4088447684 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.692307692 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362788091967 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129288381904 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911666784282 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207349726826 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438060745099 0.056905535591 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.67 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.