Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.To what extent do you agree with this view?
Art is the heritage of any nation. Making investments to promote different art forms not only preserves the rich heritage and culture of any country, but also helps to boost the economy in an indirect way. While some people consider spending on arts a wasteful expenditure, I personally believe that art ought to be promoted and government should allocate monetary resources to support artists.
The government should help support the artists to excel in their respective fields by designing various welfare schemes for them. This, in turn, will help boost the economy. For instance, let us take the example of art galleries. Encouraging artists to help create their masterpieces, which in turn will become the pride of these galleries, will attract tourists from all over the world, which shall ultimately boost the local economy from the revenue generated by tourism. Let us take the example of caves of Ajanta and Elora, The Taj Mahal, The Qutub Minar and the India Gate, which are a part of rich cultural heritage of India and these sights attract onlookers from all parts of the world.
Additionally, the artists, when become famous, bring laurels to the country. They become pride of the nation and are recognized all over the world for their excellence in their respective fields. This creates a positive impact about the country on the world platform and these artists become role model for the people from different walks of life. For example, Amitabh Bachchan is well known for his acting skills, Lata Mangeshkar is famous for her singing and M F Hussain was famous for his paintings all over the world. These people not only helped promote the art but also acted as Brand Ambassadors for the country.
To conclude, it is reiterated that although some people believe that the government should spend money on some other resources; I personally believe that artists should be motivated and government should provide them required funding for their development and survival.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-17 | divyadr93 | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-09 | Arun revanth | 61 | view |
| 2019-05-20 | marasheed1763@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-13 | RAndrewRubesh | 73 | view |
- The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress To what extent do you agree 80
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result, people gravitate towards buying their products. What problems does this cause? What could be done to encourage people to buy local products? 73
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.To what extent do you agree with this view? 93
- Measures have been put in place to improve road safety by reducing speed limits Some people believe there are better alternatives Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an indirect way" with adverb for "indirect"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ry, but also helps to boost the economy in an indirect way. While some people consider spending on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, well, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09785932722 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53236492092 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535168195719 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.9530742773 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.071428571 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119989183605 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474315569491 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521738171671 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0865976717494 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484687494963 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.