In any profession—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years. The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership
How long should an enterprise to change its chief executive, or how long should a country change their president? The statement gives an absolute answer, 5 years, and the statement reasons that the revitalization caused by new leadership is the key to success. While, in my view, both reasons and claims are too absolute. Though most western governments change president in 5 years, business leader often stay longer time to keep the company stable.
In modern society, most government has a restricted period of time in those powerful positions. It is a big improvement compare to ancient times since it ensures fairness and democracy of our society. For example, in ancient china, the emperor governs the nation all his life, and when he died, the kingship would be inherited by her son or other family member. Under such long time autocracy, many cruel kings emerged. Such as Qin Shi Huang, an emperor who order to bury the scholar alive and burn books to fool his people, and finally leads to the subversion of Qin dynasty.
Though powerful position in government should be altered in several years to avoid over-lasting autocracy, business leader has not need to mimic. First, outstanding leadership is not the surest path to success as the statement suggest. Many other factors influence the success of an enterprise, such as skills of employee, cooperation, management style, and innovation. For instance, while Steve Jobs owns lots of credits of the success of Apple, it is the employees who truly realize the amazing product. And Google also said their talented employees are real fortunes of the company.
Second, substituting leader frequently might harm the company, because new leadership often accompanies a new management style, new company policy, and thus makes some senior management lose their power because they may have same interests with old leader. Such movement may consume lots of money and leads many unstable factors in the company which most company can’t afford. Moreover, most new leaders are younger generations. Though they may bring some fresh air to the company, the veteran leaders is more experienced and live through more mistakes before.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-03-09 | qxyqxywxlwxl | 90 | view |
| 2013-03-09 | wxlwxlqxyqxy | 75 | view |
| 2012-04-05 | phil | 30 | view |
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 70
- The best way to teach—whether as an educator, employer, or parent—is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 86
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 90
- In any profession—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years. The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership 30
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 90
Sentence: How long should an enterprise to change its chief executive, or how long should a country change their president?
Description: The fragment country change their is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace their to its
Sentence: It is a big improvement compare to ancient times since it ensures fairness and democracy of our society.
Description: The fragment improvement compare to is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace compare with verb, past participle
Sentence: Second, substituting leader frequently might harm the company, because new leadership often accompanies a new management style, new company policy, and thus makes some senior management lose their power because they may have same interests with old leader.
Description: The word harm is not usually used as a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to harm
Description: The fragment management lose their is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace lose with verb, past tense
Sentence: Though they may bring some fresh air to the company, the veteran leaders is more experienced and live through more mistakes before.
Description: The fragment the veteran leaders is not usually followed by is
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace is with are
Sentence: For example, in ancient china, the emperor governs the nation all his life, and when he died, the kingship would be inherited by her son or other family member.
Error: china Suggestion: China
Sentence: Though powerful position in government should be altered in several years to avoid over-lasting autocracy, business leader has not need to mimic.
Error: over-lasting Suggestion: over lasting
Sentence: First, outstanding leadership is not the surest path to success as the statement suggest.
Error: surest Suggestion: No alternate word
Pay attention to grammars.
You may have a conclusion part to summarize your ideas.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 354 350
No. of Characters: 1775 1500
No. of Different Words: 209 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.338 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.014 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.536 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 135 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 102 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 56 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.565 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.611 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.287 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.497 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.068 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5