Task 1thetablebelowshowstheresultsofasurveyofaveragenumberofcarsperhoursusingthreesubranroadsduringworkinghoursinaten-years pollution monitoring programme. Traffic calming was introduced in harper lane at the beginning of 1999.

Essay topics:

Task 1thetablebelowshowstheresultsofasurveyofaveragenumberofcarsperhoursusingthreesubranroadsduringworkinghoursinaten-years pollution monitoring programme. Traffic calming was introduced in harper lane at the beginning of 1999.

The given table illustrates the out coming of a study of the average number of car per hours using three suburban roads from 1993to2002pollution monitoring programme.

It can bee seen, the number of vehicles in harper lane stood at 82 in1993 which was where near polluted at 600 great york and long lane 400.having been polluted at harper lane 100in1994which were near polluted at 720great york and long lane 450.furthermore in harper lane 386in 1995, which was near polluted at 700great york and long lane 600.the number of vehicles in harper lane stood at 542 in 1996which had been near polluted at667great york way and long lane 800.moreover the number of vehicles in harper lane at 630greatyork and long lane 638during period.
On the other hand, the enforcement ofharper lane at915in 1998, which was near the polluted at695great york and 700 long lane .having the number of vehicles in harper lane 204 in 1999,which had been near polluted at 911great york and 1000long lane. On the number of vehicles in harper lane 173 in2000,which were near the polluted at 902great york and 1200long lane. More over the number of vehicles in harper lane at 178in2001,which were near polluted at 900great york and 1400long lane. Further more harper lane 193in 2002 ,900great york and 1400 long lane are respectively.
Overall,it can bee seen that while great york way and long lane were the most polluted routes harper lane was least polluted roads.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-07-10 Jasbir1 67 view
Essays by user Jasbir1 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eatyork and long lane 638during period. On the other hand, the enforcement ofhar...
^^^^
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'lane' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'lanes'.
Suggestion: lanes
...e polluted at695great york and 700 long lane .having the number of vehicles in harpe...
^^^^
Line 4, column 125, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...lluted at695great york and 700 long lane .having the number of vehicles in harper ...
^^
Line 4, column 523, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ane. Further more harper lane 193in 2002 ,900great york and 1400 long lane are res...
^^
Line 4, column 553, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'lane' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'lanes'.
Suggestion: lanes
...193in 2002 ,900great york and 1400 long lane are respectively. Overall,it can bee s...
^^^^
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...400 long lane are respectively. Overall,it can bee seen that while great york way ...
^^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'routes'' or 'route's'?
Suggestion: routes'; route's
...ay and long lane were the most polluted routes harper lane was least polluted roads. ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s harper lane was least polluted roads.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99585062241 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75158490761 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.423236514523 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 153.579866878 43.030603864 357% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 172.0 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.4285714286 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307656002122 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182519925781 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656447947621 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195559307887 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829362932637 0.0819641961636 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.2329268293 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 11.4329268293 236% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 27.0 11.0658536585 244% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.