The graphs below show the average monthly expenditure on children’s sports and participation in different sports in the UK from 2008 to 2014.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates, the monthly spend on three main sports such as, football, athletics, and swimming in UK between the year of 2008 to 2014. Units are measured in million.
Overall, the most significant sports category for sports expense was football. Nevertheless, the significant changes occurred in athletics over the period given. Swimming remained almost steadily in between the year.
With regards to the amount of money spend for football, it began at around 8million then it declined to just under 8 million in 2010. While the expense again has slight increase with approximately 9% by 2014. In general, football expenditure take place mere one million over the given period.
On the other hand, athletics starts with one million in 2004. Whereas, after 2010 there were a dramatic rise in expenditure which is overcome swimming in the year of 2011. The national expenditure of atheletics remained steadily after 2012 with five million. Moreover, spendings for swimming has systematic surge from two million to approximate 4 million in the end of the graph period.
- In many developing countries there is a problem with declining quality of air and water from both industry and construction. What measures could be taken to prevent this. 78
- Many people today are worried about cybercrime such as hacking and identity theft What problems does cybercrime cause and what solutions can you suggest for ordinary people and businesses to take Give reasons for your answer and provide ideas and examples 86
- In today s job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge In the future job applicants may not need any formal qualifications To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and repairing the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... of 2008 to 2014. Units are measured in million. Overall, the most significant sport...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...llion. Overall, the most significant sports category for sports expense was footbal...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n it declined to just under 8 million in 2010. While the expense again has slight...
^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lined to just under 8 million in 2010. While the expense again has slight increase w...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as slight increase with approximately 9% by 2014. In general, football expenditur...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, nevertheless, then, whereas, while, in general, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27586206897 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71369062205 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626436781609 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3791351995 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.5 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5 22.9334400587 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123733083181 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434629901061 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635056169158 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901683432116 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662910439364 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.