A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The given statement states that a person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor. I completely agree with the claim since if someone has committed a crime knowingly, completely being cognizant of their actions and consequences, then they have betrayed the society as a whole.
No social environment supports unethical or criminal behaviour which is of unscrupulous and diabolical intention. Hence, participating or engaging in any such social activity either knowingly or under oblivion, is not only heinous but also detrimental for the perpetrator as well as the victim. If a person with total possession of their civil rights commits something looked down upon, then definitely their rights and freedom should be revoked. Neither should they be benefitted by any regular livelihood they perform.
There are multiple reasons on which the given claim is based. Firstly, any person who is a part of a healthy society is legally and morally bound to act within limits and have an appropriate conduct with fellow citizens. If the line is crossed then undoubtedly legal action must be taken and the authorities need to intervene. As a response to activity which does not conform to the standards of a balanced and halcyon society, strict measures must be taken. This includes anything from revoking civil rights to imprisonment.
Moreover if the criminal wants to move ahead and benefit from his hard work, toil and labour; he should not be allowed to do so unless completely absolved of his misdeeds. This is because a recidivist will never change his course after a punishment. If he has the nerve and gall to commit a crime with complete knowledge then a mere sentence will not affect him resulting in a change of heart. Hence, such crimes must be dealt by adopting a strict approach and no clemency should be permitted for the offender.
However some will choose to defer and rather suggest that when a person wants to change for the good who are we to stop him just because his past puts him under bad light. The claim does not prevent the offender from taking a positive turn. However, it just indicates that we should be chary of such anti-social elements and approach their cases thoughtfully.
In addition there always steps taken to ensure and validate whether a person has fully recovered and taken the salubrious path of life. We can always verify if he has left the base behaviour and moved ahead to a new beginning. Only after assuring should step further and adopt a method to approach the case pertaining to a criminal and decide on its outcome.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-11 | Mithil | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Anish Sapkota | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | Gnyana | 62 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2023-03-16 | Yam Kumar Oli | 50 | view |
- A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio.“We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10% in order to ensure a quality product. As you know, we are working with a first-time director, whose only previo 83
- "Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men 83
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 89
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 50
- The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangere 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...voking civil rights to imprisonment. Moreover if the criminal wants to move ahead and...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...hould be permitted for the offender. However some will choose to defer and rather su...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...proach their cases thoughtfully. In addition there always steps taken to ensure and ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2231.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 454.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9140969163 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63858357275 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530837004405 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 698.4 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5286694404 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.238095238 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.619047619 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332688398481 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893688428483 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11509912351 0.0758088955206 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172296891705 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135577282038 0.0667264976115 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.