The means of communicating in society today has changed markedly over the last ten years. In your opinion, what are the positive and negative impacts of this change?
Recently, the phenomenon of communicating in society today has changed markedly over the last ten years and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the positive and negative impacts of this change can be a plus, and I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the positive impacts can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of critical issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own example, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered vocational education. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the negative impacts might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, fundamental aspects of practical learning could relate to this reality that the demerits of a laboratory experiment pertain to the intellectual development. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of communicating in society today far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint social implications
- The experience of work is more important than having a qualification? Do u agree or disagree? 11
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. discuss. 85
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards, what are the positive and negative impact on life and work. 88
- Violence portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in crime in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Some people point out that experimental learning can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experimental learning can work well in high schools or colleges? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76534296029 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29401364247 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624548736462 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1200588784 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.083333333 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271099497941 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860064050969 0.0925447433944 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104342025387 0.071462118173 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149324021934 0.151781067708 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123515394603 0.0609392437508 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.