Some people think that school should teach students to understand right, wrong and good behaviour, instead of this being only parents responsibility. Do you agree or disagree with the given statement ?
Students are believed to be the building blocks of their nations. Presently, some people are of the opinion that it is the prime duty of school authorities to develop sensible behaviour and better understanding of right and wrong among students, instead keeping only parents assigned for this job. Here, I would like to accord with the given statement.
There are manifold points to endorse my point of view. First and foremost, parents, nowadays, have busiest lifestyle and they are unable to find quality time for their children to teach them good characteristics. Therefore, school is a perfect place where teachers are assigned for social, intellectual and educational development of children. What is more, modern schools provide a healthy learning environment for the overall development of students. To demonstrate, teachers maintain discipline, rules and regulations in an effective manner. Besides this, they not only inculcate social, moral and cultural values but also prevent them from bad habits. Thus, teachers who are professionally trained can be vital for the holistic development of children.
Further emphasising on my point of view, unlike parents, teachers are the most influential personalities for students on account of their special teaching skills, and strategies. To illustrate, teachers are trained to handle students by both friendly and stringent behaviour. What is more, they know some great inspirational stories and real life examples to boost the confidence and morality among children. As a result, the contribution of teachers is remarkable to make students noble citizens. All of above, in the schools, students have to study with the group of students in a class where teachers can analyse their behaviour towards their classmates who belong to different castes, categories and religions. Thus, it is more easy for teachers to tell them the difference between right and wrong behaviour in comparison to parents. On the contrary, others have conflicting views.
They think that, parents are supposed to be the first mentor of their children and they have strong emotional attachment, love and care for their adolescents. Therefore, parents, being the best well wishers of their children can be claimed to set the moral and sensible behaviour of their children towards others. In addition, teachers nowadays focus more on the academic skills of students rather than social development. Needless to say, parents can be the best guide for their juveniles at their homes.
To recapitulate, undeniably, parents have a role to play in the development of good manners; however, teachers can act more successfully than parents to shape children into decent characters.
- Some people are reducing their walks, however many health experts say that walking is thebest exercise to maintain health. Why do people walk less? What might encourage people to walk longer distances? 87
- In the last 20 years there have been significant developments in the field of information technology (IT), for example the World Wide Web and communication by email. However, these developments in IT are likely to have more negative effects than positive. 80
- People who have original ideas are of much greater value to society than those who are simply able to copy the ideas of others well. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 80
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.To what extend do you agree or disagree? 90
- Some people believe that young people should have university education because this will bring benefit to the society Others however believe that it will lead to graduate unemployment Discuss both views and give your opinion 97
Comments
Hello sir, rate this essay as
Hello sir, rate this essay as well plzzz
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
No. of Words: 420 while No. of Different Words: 218
We are expecting:
No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
means sentences are not developed efficiently.
you may:
1. remove the third paragraph with less content
2. remove those transition words. they are too much, and duplicated. like: 'What is more'
--------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 420 350
No. of Characters: 2217 1500
No. of Different Words: 218 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.527 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.279 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.802 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 170 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 142 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 103 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 52 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.091 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.885 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.591 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.295 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.486 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.07 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the busiest'.
Suggestion: have the busiest
... First and foremost, parents, nowadays, have busiest lifestyle and they are unable to find q...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective manner" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ntain discipline, rules and regulations in an effective manner. Besides this, they not only inculcate ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...e holistic development of children. Further emphasising on my point of view, unlike...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, as a result, on the contrary, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2290.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 420.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45238095238 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91707382969 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3855383948 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.090909091 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211004067418 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606352168617 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581410713325 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139625674397 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107572321014 0.056905535591 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.