A glance at the bar chart provided illustrates the differences between six types of goods consumed in four nations.
This is such a clear-cut evidence from the provided information that photographic film tended to be the most popular choice in Britain, France, and Germany.
On one hand, it can be seen clearly that British ranked first in expenditure of photographic film, toys, CDs, perfumes, and personal stereos. Besides, tennis racquets were also consumed most in not only Britain, but also Italy, which was 155 thousand pounds sterling. Coming to France, it prefered using photographic film, toys, and to the others. The most common use was photographic film, with 165 thousand pounds sterling whereas tennis racquets were the least used good.
On the other hand, the amount of consumer goods in Germany were quite unique that 150 thousand pounds sterling spent on each of photographic film, perfumes, and tennis racquets. Moreover, the amount of toys and CDs stood at 145 thousand pounds sterling while personal stereos was a little more. The striking thing is that the same situation occured in Italy when Italian consumed the same amount of photographic film, perfumes, and tennis racquets (155 thousand pounds sterling). Besides, CDs were as prevalent as personal stereos (150 thousand pounds sterling for each). Furthermore, toys are utilized by Italian as the same amount with French, which was over 155 thousand pounds sterling.
- Today, the quality of life in large cities is decreasing. Discuss the causes and solutions. 47
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries. 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... only Britain, but also Italy, which was 155 thousand pounds sterling. Coming to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1219.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60254710193 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0230519464 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.818181818 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128520067088 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578284479906 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764236141712 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979992829751 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982345388453 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.