The graph below compares figures for production and consumption of energy in the U.S from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts the figuers of 2025
The given layout demostrale information about that campares for production consumption of energy in the U.S from 1950 to 2000. Moreover predicts the year 2025.
As the start with that, The consumption of 25 energy unit at the 1950 year. As well as after five year consumption are zik zack. Moreover 1972 year are 70 energy unit U.S consumption. Futhur year 2000 equal to 100 consumption. Beside year 2025 to serdenly incress to 145 energy unit U.S consumption
Our On the other hand, The U.S production of 25 energy unit at the 1950 year. Howeven after five year zik zack postion. Although year 1975 to incress 60 energy unit U.S production. On the other side year 2000 to same 60. Moreover 2025 year serdenly incress to 90.
At the end, U.S consumption lowest to 1950 in 25 and highest to 2025 to 140. Futhur U.S production Minimum year 1950 in 25 and maximum 2025 to 90.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-24 | Gursimran singh | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...oduction consumption of energy in the U.S from 1950 to 2000. Moreover predicts th...
^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...of energy in the U.S from 1950 to 2000. Moreover predicts the year 2025. As the start...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ter five year consumption are zik zack. Moreover 1972 year are 70 energy unit U.S consum...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...Moreover 1972 year are 70 energy unit U.S consumption. Futhur year 2000 equal to ...
^
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...o serdenly incress to 145 energy unit U.S consumption Our On the other hand,...
^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cress to 145 energy unit U.S consumption Our On the other hand, The U.S producti...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 31, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...ption Our On the other hand, The U.S production of 25 energy unit at the 195...
^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...weven after five year zik zack postion. Although year 1975 to incress 60 energy unit U.S...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...h year 1975 to incress 60 energy unit U.S production. On the other side year 2000...
^
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...On the other side year 2000 to same 60. Moreover 2025 year serdenly incress to 90. A...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 15, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...rdenly incress to 90. At the end, U.S consumption lowest to 1950 in 25 and hi...
^
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...25 and highest to 2025 to 140. Futhur U.S production Minimum year 1950 in 25 and ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 734.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70512820513 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51161012188 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 71.0 106.607317073 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455128205128 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 195.3 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6085463331 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 56.4615384615 112.824112599 50% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.0 22.9334400587 52% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.46153846154 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 1.69756097561 707% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249920840985 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111226505082 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855949664705 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212985004188 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109704883492 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.8 13.2329268293 51% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.68 61.2550243902 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.3012195122 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.15 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.46 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.