With the globalisation, international tourism has become more frequent in recent years and brought plentiful economic stimulations to a lot of places in the world. However, I think differently that the devastating impacts it brought to the environment and local inhabitants of the places strongly outweigh the benefits.
To begin with, international tourism promotes a host of companies to exploit the countrysides in order to be the hotspots. Some places are full of natural views and fresh air such as Amazon or Hawaii. Yet, international corruptions earn the benefits by hook or by crook, resorting a range of hotels and other various industries like catering and retailing there . It undoubtedly damages the local pristine environment.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Arfinah
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment.Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?Give reasons for your ans 78
- International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment.Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?Give reasons for your ans 22
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... places strongly outweigh the benefits. To begin with, international tourism pro...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...stries like catering and retailing there . It undoubtedly damages the local prist...
^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...damages the local pristine environment.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, i think, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 41.998997996 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 629.0 1615.20841683 39% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 115.0 315.596192385 36% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46956521739 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.27472217062 4.20363070211 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25240010161 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 176.041082164 46% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.704347826087 0.561755894193 125% => OK
syllable_count: 194.4 506.74238477 38% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 16.0721442886 37% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8540805784 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.833333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21799300866 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913649997478 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469859186407 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16345407877 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254915874716 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 78.4519038076 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 22.4719101124 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.