The use of a mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so the mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the mobile phone has become an essential part of our society moving and cannot think of moving without it, on the other hand, it also diminishing moral assets in literary society. As smoking has spread like cancer in our civil society same as the cellular phone. Use of cellphone should be restricted to some extent. I will be discussing my views in the following paragraph.
It is a fact that, that the use of the cellular phone has increased very drastically in the last five years and it is putting to death the social values of our society which is very alarming. The limitation should be enforced in areas where a family gathering is being held. For instance, the practice of using mobile devices has extensively increased in schools, because of that kids are getting a diversion from their studies and are getting involved in the use of applications which are not suitable for their age. Their thinking capabilities are getting near to the ground and just relying on different software which is easily available on one touch and their problem gets solved.
Secondly, in our community families are getting away from each other and they prefer to give their thoughts for any occasions by just making calls in spite of visiting. Such as, in the family get-together use of such gadgets, should be restricted so they can mingle with each-other share their thoughts and enjoy the occasions. In a family, no one has time to talk to each other as they all remain busy in their cellular life.
I conclude, to pen down by saying that the use of mobile phone should be restricted as to the amount of liability in our society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...shing moral assets in literary society. As smoking has spread like cancer in our c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for instance, such as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75438596491 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55082168911 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7152974137 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.916666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177571736757 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766027930228 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063125211771 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13277524259 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683109438605 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.