Young people are much more aware of and concerned about issues like the environment, poverty and animal welfare than the previous generation. What is your own opinion?

It is a well-known fact that every new generation is more aware of their environment and understands their social concerns like poverty and animal rights than their parents. Due to belief in technological development and evolution of civilization, my personal opinion goes hand in hand with this statement.

With every passing day, new technologies are developed and the learning process for common people is getting easier. People traveled for hundreds and thousands of miles to learn about one subject. Today, people are graduating at home, hence, making it possible for each new generation to know more about things that matter to them. In old days people did not know about the causes of natural events like earth quake and solar or lunar eclipse. Even children learn at school about the causes of such phenomenon. Furthermore, each new generation inherits the knowledge gained by their parents and they advances the already available information to them.

Similarly, in the past, people could not understand or analyse the factors that causes poverty. Today, the latest economical techniques can help young people understand the reasons of poverty, how it impacts a country or our society and how to alleviate poverty. Electronic media and social networking have spread awareness at such a level that people know about the smallest happenings around them. Moreover, people's perspective about collective development and inclusiveness have been broadened with time and this makes young people more aware about their surroundings.

In addition to the above, in the past people used to live off animals and animals were considered the only source of food and that they held the belief that animals were only meant for their food. But, today, social groups have been created who are vegetarians and rejects the idea of meat consumption. They believe that animals also have rights as humans do. Others who still consume meat also endorses the idea that animals must be at least kept in a humane environment. Like they shall not be tortured or killed unnecessarily.

In conclusion, I can say that the technological development have given young generation more access to information and knowledge. They know more about the natural events, animal rights and living standards of the people around then than their parents. Also, it is a continuation of the civilizational evolution that makes us more knowledgeable than our predecessors.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...pment and evolution of civilization, my personal opinion goes hand in hand with this statement. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 601, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'advance'
Suggestion: advance
...wledge gained by their parents and they advances the already available information to th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 242, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... today, social groups have been created who are vegetarians and rejects the idea of mea...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re knowledgeable than our predecessors.
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, moreover, similarly, so, still, then, well, at least, in addition, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2059.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29305912596 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80528575042 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519280205656 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 642.6 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5584877225 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.95 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.45 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248395723883 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072144471188 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519645969583 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141587548976 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329526924863 0.056905535591 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.