Glass is a favored building material
Glass for Bird
The main idea for both reading and lecture is the way to keep the bird from glass. The author of reading believes that they need change the kinds of glass. The lecturer cast doubt the points that the author said. The lecture thinks that changing the glass type is not effective.
First of all, the author points out that changing the window to one way glass will be good by the bird cannot see inside. The point challenged by the lecturer. He said that it can be mirror for them. It can be danger again.
Secondly, the reading says that the window need to be colorful which is hard to see for bird. The lecturer rebuts that the reading made. He thinks that it is not benefits both people inside the building and birds. The colorful painting can be looks like hole for bird and it makes dark inside.
Finally, the reading wants to put the magnetic function for the windows to signal the birds. But the listening says that the birds use the magnetic signal when they are on long trip. By using the eyes for short trip, he thinks that the magnetic window cannot be great solution.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-15 | nusybah | 83 | view |
2023-06-27 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
2023-06-15 | Vivian Chang | 78 | view |
2023-02-26 | rodriannnn | 76 | view |
2023-01-29 | reza_fattahi | 80 | view |
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 65
- Every generation of people is different in important ways How is your generation different from your parents generation Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer 100
- Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well 70
- TPO-12 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Glass for Bird The main idea for both...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Glass for Bird The main idea for both reading and lectu...
^^^^
Line 2, column 215, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... doubt the points that the author said. The lecture thinks that changing the glass ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, look, second, secondly, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 1373.03311258 66% => OK
No of words: 202.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49504950495 5.08290768461 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.9528055873 2.5805825403 76% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 145.348785872 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485148514851 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 419.366225166 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.55342163355 84% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8126006862 49.2860985944 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 60.5333333333 110.228320801 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.4666666667 21.698381199 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0926009886506 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337652794928 0.0996497079465 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491916085489 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749683041893 0.162205337803 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620294107731 0.0443174109184 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.5 13.3589403974 49% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 83.66 53.8541721854 155% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 11.0289183223 44% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.23 12.2367328918 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.0 8.42419426049 71% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 63.6247240618 35% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 5.0 11.2008830022 45% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.