In many country there are people with extreme high income some say it is good for Nation. While other claim government should limits there salary. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
Money is not god but not less than good. Presently, In many nation masses are extra ordinary high income it is good for nation. While others claim that administration should limited there salary. Here, this easy elebrate both side with my perception.
There are manifold points to endorse former view. First and foremost, In a country folk are earning high income for government jobs. To illustrate, administration should give limited salary for budget of workers. Government get workers financial budget by paying tax and spend the to incomplete work. Moreover, people with tremendous income one suppose of donate a great deal of finance to charity. However, to get poor people fulfill their desires. As a result, high income is important because people fulfill their desires. Furthermore, some can talented people with exceptional plair can contribute remarkably for program of nation. For example, amita Buchan in flimy industry or sachin tendulkar is a sport field on the nation.
On the other hand. There are conflicting view, people with higher income may lead to descrimition among society. For example, people doing hard work not only earn money but also earn bread and butter. Some people get higher income to live astrocrative life with any work. Apart form it, affiluent people are often targeted by the criminal forth sake of money. Thus, crime rate will be increase. So administration should restriction their salary.
From my notion, both sides have their own significant. The higher money so any people fulfill their own dreams. Higher money people are solve social and personal problem.
To recapitulate, administration should observe the value of every person and give the own their budget.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-02 | Jaspreet sidhu | 61 | view |
- Some people believe that vertical city in which people work and live in toll building is a good idea other say horizontal living is better. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 56
- In many country an increasing number of people are suffering from health problem as a result of eating too much fast food . it is therefore necessary for government to improve higher taxes on this kind of food . to what extent do you agree or disagree. 61
- Some people think that the effective way to reduce pollution is to tax the companies which cause it. Others think that there are better ways to achieve this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- Some people think that the effective way to reduce pollution is to tax the companies which cause it. Others think that there are better ways to achieve this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- In many country an increasing number of people are suffering from health problem as a result of eating too much fast food . it is therefore necessary for government to improve higher taxes on this kind of food . to what extent do you agree or disagree. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nary high income it is good for nation. While others claim that administration should...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'folk'?
Suggestion: folk
... view. First and foremost, In a country folk are earning high income for government ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: APART_FORM[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'apart from'?
Suggestion: Apart from
...o live astrocrative life with any work. Apart form it, affiluent people are often targeted...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27737226277 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63528922904 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609489051095 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 20.2975951904 54% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.1552729776 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 60.25 106.682146367 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.4166666667 20.7667163134 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.95833333333 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380316271699 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965032866289 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756955126686 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193101324046 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123568324846 0.056905535591 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.85 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.16 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.1190380762 63% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.