Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may have a negative impact on others.
To what extent is this style of management effective?
Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard?
In companies it is one of the most important tasks of employers to motivate their workers in order to increase the effectiveness of them and the overall benefit of the company. For centuries many economist have attempted hard to find most influential method of motivating and paying extra money for distinctive contributions has usually been on the top list of such methods. But many people claim that, this motivating style is not perfect, because although it is stimuli for workers getting prize, it usually affects the others’ working desire negatively. I don’t completely agree with this opi...
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 65
- The pictures below show how someone can be tracked using an electronic tracking device. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown. 85
- Some people believe that computers are more a hindrance than a help in today’s world. Others feel that they are such indispensable tools that they would not be able to live or work without them.•In what ways are computers a hindrance?•What is your opinion 85
- The graphs show the types of music albums purchased by people according to sex and age. 75
- In some countries it is illegal for companies to reject job applicants for their age Is it positive or negative to the development 73
Sentence: As we all know, competition usually trigger improvement and as a result of this fact, it can be said that money awards usually cause total rise in the general success rate of company.
Description: The fragment competition usually trigger is rare
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 312 350
No. of Characters: 1495 1500
No. of Different Words: 176 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.203 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.792 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.592 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 102 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 80 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 47 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.364 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.623 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.636 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.359 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.671 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.092 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5