The line graph shows the percentage of people living below poverty line in developing countries for the year 1900 to 2050.
The line graph highlights the information about during the year 1900 to 2050 the percentage of people living below the poverty line in developing four different countries. The data is calibrated in percentum.which is clearly and coherently represented.
It can be seen that, during the year 1900, in china, the people living below the poverty line was 18%. However, during the year 2000, the percentage of people were below the poverty line that 80%. furthermore, during the year 1950, in Brazil, the percentage of people living below the poverty line had 30%.
As far as trend was concerned, during the year 1900, the percentage of people living below the poverty line by the China was egual.as well as, during the year 2050, in India, the people living below the poverty line reached had been 70%. In Mexico, china, India, the percentage of people living below the poverty line 60%, 75%, 80% respectively.
Overall, it is evident that, the largest percentage of people living below the poverty line in Mexico. As well as, the least percentage of people living below the poverty line in china.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 197, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...e were below the poverty line that 80%. furthermore, during the year 1950, in Brazil, the p...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97826086957 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53155884193 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 74.0 106.607317073 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.402173913043 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.304589154 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.777777778 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.610315903416 0.215688989381 283% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.351004509179 0.103423049105 339% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146882257437 0.0843802449381 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.467498689467 0.15604864568 300% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194008853972 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.