Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?
Today the way that a large number of people communicate with the others has changed because of technology. It maybe has affected to the types of relationships which people make.
Howeve, technology also help people to interact with each other more easily in some ways. For examples, when we go overseas, we have many things that we cannot translate them from our mother-tongue to that country language. Thanks to advanced technology development, scientists have creatively invented a phone-shaped device that could convert a language to another through the line. Moreover, we also use video call or social network to connect with people from a far. In contrast, there are more disadvantages than advantages. When we go to most of coffee shops, in a group of people sit around a table, each person's hands have a smartphone for chatting or surfing the Internet. They can do that in whole day instead of talking face to face to the person is sitting opposite them. Another example is all of people in the world use the social network like Facebook, Twitter, ... . They help people to find and make friends faster and easier than the tradional way, but the fact remains that in one day, you are sad then you chat and talk to one of your online friend about your sad story and share your bad feeling. Maybe they just console you by some words which appear on the phone's screen.
In conclusion, technology will be developped more quick than it is today, more modern but besides this maybe become a negative development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
Today the way that a large number of people communicate with the others has ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 464, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...ial network to connect with people from a far. In contrast, there are more disadvanta...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 731, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'face to'.
Suggestion: face to
...do that in whole day instead of talking face to face to the person is sitting opposite them. An...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 880, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...cial network like Facebook, Twitter, ... . They help people to find and make frien...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, may, moreover, so, then, for example, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83846153846 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58611939381 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623076923077 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8271772807 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7692307692 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289392691857 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100875125634 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110407434669 0.0667982634062 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244625391067 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154473723896 0.056905535591 271% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.