Well, no one can deny the fact that in order to be a great leader a person must have the sense of tolerance, patience and equity towards everything and everyone. In order for the leader of a nation or any other sector to be truly great, he or she has to espouse everything that comes with it. The diversity, the melange of ethnicities, religions, races, cultures and traditions and also affluence and poverty. Therefore, I believe that a leader must have a sense of forbearance towards each and every person and situation and must be cooperative enough to deal with these circumstances. However, instilling just a sense of cooperation and not competition may lead them to be indulgent, because a sense of competition can be the impetus on which a leader thrives to become better. One can reflect on the following examples and comprehend how only a sense of cooperation may lead to a doom of a leader.
Well, let's take an example of an industry owner who does not have a sense of competition and always is very cooperative with his other industry counterparts and very acquiescent to their demands which in turn gets him to lose a lot business and financial instability. So, if only he thrived on cooperation and equanimity towards his competitors he is bound to fail. Therefore, a healthy sense of competition must also be there so that there is always room for improvement and betterment.
Another instance of a national leader can be taken who is always willing to compromise with other leaders and lowers the taxes on imports and exports for other countries to have a sufficiently profitable business overseas. This is fine if, the nation is doing financially well and is stable to endure such lower taxes. However, if this is not the case then that nation's economy is bound to crumple and the nation is nearing downfall. In this, case the leadership with just a sense of cooperation will be razed to the ground
To conclude, I think that in order for a society to produce better leaders, the best way would be to instill both a sense of cooperation and healthy competition which will not only be beneficial for the society but also for those individuals in the long run.
The advertising director's argument that they should allocate greater budget for advertising the movies next year so that they can reach the public is spurious on various grounds as it lacks certain crucial information that could justify the claims.
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News:"The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg. Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions. Since they were declared a wi 63
- A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio.“We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10% in order to ensure a quality product. As you know, we are working with a first-time director, whose only previou 65
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of KNOW radio station."Several factors indicate that KNOW radio can no longer succeed as a rock-and-roll music station. Consider, for example, that the number of people in our listening area over fif 65
- A recent study reported that pet owners have longer, healthier lives on average than do people who own no pets. Specifically, dog owners tend to have a lower incidence of heart disease. In light of these findings, Sherwood Hospital should form a partnersh 33
- A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio.“We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10% in order to ensure a quality product. As you know, we are working with a first-time director, whose only previou 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ever, if this is not the case then that nations economy is bound to crumple and the nat...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, well, as to, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2016.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81145584726 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82012795933 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491646778043 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.8452371225 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.0 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9285714286 23.4991977007 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176829013515 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576867031931 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657863123343 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1095998685 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782006065937 0.0667264976115 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.