Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and example to support answer.
It is generally accepted that people need to have reasonable hours for working during the day. Some people believe that working five days a week for fewer hours is much better than working three days for long hours; nevertheless, other people do not think so. However, it is challenging for us to prefer one to another because both of them have their advantages and disadvantages. As a matter of fact, there are numerous reasons why working five days during a week with regarding an apt hour is attractive, and I would explore only a few primary ones here.
In the beginning, the first aspect to point is that working with the suitable hours leads to increasing people's productivity in their career due to the fact that they will not be tired during the work day. In fact, work hours should be defined according to some significant features of people includes not only power but also energy. For example, tow group of workers with different work hours such as 12 and 8 hour, were examined in other to find an apt work hour that they will be have a maximum amount of productivity. After that, some workers, who had worked more than 12 hours, had the lowest amount of yield. Hence, paying attention to the hours that people will work is critical.
Second, the most persuasive point is that increasing the works hours during the day will have some prone such as the lack of sufficient focus on work. To illustrate this point only needs refer to a company where their workers have to work for long time during the day, even if their holiday has been so long. Given this issue, they were not capable of concentrating on their work; furthermore, their activities would be done incorrectly, owing to the operation of their mind has decreased. Thus, if the number of work hours during a day was extended to more hours, it would lead to create some problems for people.
From what has been discussed above, we may safely draw the conclusion that people should have an appropriate work hour; therefore, the considerable factors in having a good work hour are not only enhancing people's output but also having adequate concentrate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-18 | negar_nouri123 | 76 | view |
| 2018-08-18 | negar_nouri123 | 76 | view |
| 2018-08-18 | negar_nouri123 | 90 | view |
| 2018-08-18 | negar_nouri123 | 90 | view |
| 2018-08-18 | negar_nouri123 | 90 | view |
- tpo 3
- tpo 44 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. use specific reasons and example to support your answer. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following sentence? In the past, Young people depended too much on their parents to make a decision for them; today young people are better able to make decision about their own life. 70
- Tpo 33 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 412, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hour' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hours'.
Suggestion: hours
...h different work hours such as 12 and 8 hour, were examined in other to find an apt ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73045822102 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5009758995 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525606469003 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.3091659026 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.357142857 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4285714286 5.45110844103 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352516270193 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149088055276 0.076458572812 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755523255666 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237747308274 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084797716019 0.0645574589148 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 58.1214874552 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.