It is clear that technology has changed our lives, and it will ever after and our dependence on it will increase, as suggested in the prompt. Whether our ability to think for ourselves will diminish is, however, up to the success of artificial intelligent (abbreviated as A.I. so on) replacing human brain. The degree of technological advance where A.I. can completely substitute human beings’ thinking is called singular point. If that point is achieved, people’s mental ability will surely degenerate.
The fields once regarded as original domains of human beings are now being conquered by A.I. slowly but irreversibly. When Deep Blue, an A.I. devised to play chess, beats the Russian grand master, people still had hope: Although it’s calculation speed for the reasonable number of cases in the game overwhelms that of humans, we have intuitions that cannot be installed in computer. This was followed by the belief that when the number of possible strategies is more than the number of every single molecules in the universe, --- so it is not possible to find the best choice for a given time---well-trained human beings’ insights will not be defeated by computers. Unfortunately, a recent series of victories of AlphaGo, the top-notch A.I. against the champions of Go, known as a representative game that requires intuitions, debunked this belief.
Just like other parts of human body, brain deteriorates if we do not use it regularly with minimal intensity. Suppose A.I.s evolve further and make every decision instead of people after some point in the future. We may rely on A.I. in business, legal, medical and agricultural areas. People may even manage relationships with others echoing the proper expressions suggested by A.I. We will not produce artworks suffering from ever-lasting pains as creators anymore. Rather, we would enjoy paintings, sculptures, and music ‘created’ by mighty A.I. This seemingly Utopia accompanies the withering of human beings’ mental ability over every area. We already have experienced prototype of this deterioration. Recall that we used to memorize the phone numbers of our friends, family, and colleagues in 1980 and 1990s. Now no more than two or three digits of the phone numbers of our closest friends remains in our mind. If this phenomenon gets serious, our brain will never be able to function as we do nowadays.
For luck of some people who hate to face such situation, it is not clear whether singular point which results in these mental degenerations comes in the end. Though the speed of improvements in A.I. is remarkable, at least for now the technology has a clear limit. The replacement of humans’ mind with A.I. requires a necessary condition; it should pass a test called Turing test. In this test, A.I. is said to have been developed enough to replace one-to-one human relationships if people cannot discern between the chatting with another human being and an A.I. The test is thought as the first stage toward singular point, but clearing this test is found to be incredibly difficult even with the most recent technologies. Therefore, it is hard to determine whether the technology will eventually arrive at singular point. If it turns out that A.I. will end up with being the mere assistant of humans, people cannot help but exercise their brains making and solving new problems on their own.
The probability of mental deterioration is heavily dependent upon the possibility of the rise of singular point. If it happens, it would be highly likely that our descendants will experience the degeneration of their ability to think for themselves. On the other hand, if we are the last resort of problem solving, new problems will always tease us and train our mental abilities. Therefore, the prediction relating technology and humans’ mental ability is hardly a simple problem. The most likely answer would be, therefore, that it depends.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 68
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 83
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 75
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study because acquiring knowledge of various academic disciplines is the best way to become truly educated. 79
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'degenerations'' or 'degeneration's'?
Suggestion: degenerations'; degeneration's
...lar point which results in these mental degenerations comes in the end. Though the speed of i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, at least, sort of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 33.0505617978 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3321.0 2235.4752809 149% => OK
No of words: 638.0 442.535393258 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20532915361 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.02579962599 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96451271674 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 333.0 215.323595506 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521943573668 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 1027.8 704.065955056 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.874532876 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.607142857 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35714285714 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234231269971 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626269890374 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505698157571 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139142165377 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584070012627 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 167.0 100.480337079 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.