sports, plating in a team or individual? what are the reviews and possible solutions for that? discuss.
Recently, the phenomenon of sports and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that reviews and solutions can be a plus, and I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, playing in a team can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of critical issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, an individual play might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, the fundamental elements of the faulty system could relate to this reality that the demerits of a hit ball pertain to health problems. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this unique phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of sorts plating individually far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this remarkable phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-21 | dhavalpatel095 | 85 | view |
| 2018-08-21 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
| 2018-08-21 | dhavalpatel095 | 85 | view |
| 2018-08-21 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
| 2018-08-21 | dhavalpatel095 | 85 | view |
- Cashless society 88
- If you are assigned to work on a study on climate change, what will you choose to focus on and why? 11
- Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 88
- The mass media, including television, radio and newspapers, have great influence in shaping people's ideas. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- In education system, assessment through written formal examinations is still valid or not? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56488549618 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21437501668 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660305343511 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.430667678 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0850730210737 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0258606056522 0.0925447433944 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436079979283 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0469526523485 0.151781067708 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257132324644 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.