Recent reports assert that cheating among college students and university students is on the rise. At the first glance, the an honor code implemented by Groveton College seems very effective in reducing the number of cheating cases but a careful scrutiny of the argument sheds light on a plethora of flaws which test the validity of the argument.
Firstly, the honor code works as follows: a student agrees not to cheat in their academic endeavors and to report to their faculty member if they have witnessed any cheating. This is very controversial and there are multifarious factors which undermine this honor code. For example, what if the students agree to the terms but don't abide by it? It is human behavior to agree to follow a law but break the rules and regulations of it. Hence, there is no guarantee that by signing a honor code, every student will abide by the rules and not digress into unscrupulous ways.
Secondly, the argument posits that before the honor code was in place, the teachers closely monitored students. The number of cases reported during that time exceed the number of cases being reported since the honor code came into force/ Is the honor code truly responsible for the decrease? What if the teachers reported more accurately compared to the students? Probably, the teachers were very meticulous in their duties and carefully observed the ones who cheated and reported them. This might not be the case with students. They might take the sides of their friends and never report their names which can portray a biased nature of students.
Thirdly, the number of cases being reported by students has been declining. What if the students are being bullied when they go and report cases of copying? What if the students aren't being truthful? What if the cheating cases have actually increased but are going unreported? The argument would have to answer these questions which would be helpful to evaluate the recommendation if the honor code is helpful or not?
Additionally, the argument states that a majority of Groveton students agreed that they are less likely to cheat with an honor code in place. This statement doesn't prove that the students are being honest. Maybe, they want this honor code because cheating in exams has become an easier option than it was when teachers closely monitored the students.
Thus, in conclusion, the argument has many logical flaws and providing more information regarding those questions will be salutary to evaluate the argument. As of now, it is difficult to assess if the honor code has actually proved effective in reducing the number of cases or the reports of cheating is just a bogus number.
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 66
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 50
- 1.Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books."We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base because 43
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 40 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 452 350
No. of Characters: 2172 1500
No. of Different Words: 205 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.611 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.805 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.442 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 145 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 113 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 87 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.652 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.494 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.609 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.33 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.55 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.12 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'an' is left.
Suggestion: the; an
...ts is on the rise. At the first glance, the an honor code implemented by Groveton Coll...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... if the students agree to the terms but dont abide by it? It is human behavior to ag...
^^^^
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
..., there is no guarantee that by signing a honor code, every student will abide by...
^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
... cases of copying? What if the students arent being truthful? What if the cheating ca...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t if the students arent being truthful? What if the cheating cases have actually inc...
^^^^
Line 9, column 158, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... an honor code in place. This statement doesnt prove that the students are being hones...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, third, thirdly, thus, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.6327345309 127% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 11.1786427146 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 28.8173652695 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 55.5748502994 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2233.0 2260.96107784 99% => OK
No of words: 449.0 441.139720559 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97327394209 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49963266333 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 204.123752495 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458797327394 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 705.55239521 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 19.7664670659 116% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.8881675874 57.8364921388 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0869565217 119.503703932 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5217391304 23.324526521 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.39130434783 5.70786347227 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.20758483034 171% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418299969589 0.218282227539 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132995416858 0.0743258471296 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118431441498 0.0701772020484 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245980901785 0.128457276422 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113143175352 0.0628817314937 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.3799401198 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.5979740519 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 98.500998004 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.