The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U.S from 1960 to 2011.
The line graph illustrates waste recycling rates in the U.S between 1960 and 2011.The data calibrated in millions of tons.
Have a look on the total waste recovery material and percentage of recycling, in 1960, the amount of garbage was 5.6 of first one while, the second place was 1.2% higher rather than the former. Moreover, till 1985 both were showing significant rise with the difference of near around six million tons whereas, total waste recovery material which was exactly recorded 14.5 million tons in 1980.
By having a glance on the other years, inclination observed for the following 21 years. Garbage recovery material touched the peak point about 86.9 million tons however, 3% products recycling in every year and at last it reached on 34.7%.
Overall, the total waste had recovered in highest proportion as compare to the recycling of other things over the time period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
- The Charts below show the popularity of different political parties in a country before and after the general election The election won by the Conservative party and they formed a government with the liberal Democrats 77
- In the past when students did a university degree, they tended to study in their own country .Now a days, they have more opportunities to study abroad.What are the advantages and disadvantages to study abroad. 67
- The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990.Causes of land degradation by region 73
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. 56
- The tables below give the information about the world population and distribution in 1950 and 2000 with an estimate of the situation in 2050. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...ustrates waste recycling rates in the U.S between 1960 and 2011.The data calibrat...
^
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... rates in the U.S between 1960 and 2011.The data calibrated in millions of tons. H...
^^^
Line 4, column 40, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the highest'.
Suggestion: in the highest
... Overall, the total waste had recovered in highest proportion as compare to the recycling ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, moreover, second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 742.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04761904762 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44252740364 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.687074829932 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7719191837 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220489004007 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108398449475 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121857711397 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148561952204 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131695219369 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.