It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

Nowadays, the number of people who want to have a vacation in isolated region has significant increase. While this trend is beneficial to some extent, I would argue that it has more drawback.
On the one hand, travelling in remote area has several advantages. Firstly, since the tourism industry has remarkable development, popular places are visited by the great number of visitors. As a result, these people might want to travel in secluded area which is newer and more interested. This trend could make visitors feel challenged, have valuable experience and unforgettable memory. However, going to isolated area might allow people especially scientist to discover new places, experience different cultures and acquire more knowledge about natural habitat. A clear example of this is when travelling in South Pole, people can learn about the life of polar bears which live far away from humans or how to cook and keep warm in the cold area. If scientists do not discover in isolated place, people might not achieve profound knowledge. Finally, the significant increase in the number of tourists which lead to the development of tourism industry. As a result, this factor might create job opportunity or increase the amount of money which are earned by local people.
On the other hand, I believe that this trend has some drawback. The most important consideration is environment problem. Due to traveling on remote places has rapid development, the environment in these places might be effected negatively or touched by resident or visitor. As a result, the natural environment might be spoiled by irresponsible tourist or might be change by local people. To illustrate, these individuals usually litter wherever they go. Moreover, because of the wide range of risk of isolated places, visitor might face with a lot of serious problem such as predator or be diseased by hard weather in this place. As a result, these people might spend a large amount of investment in tools or ensuring their health. The cost of travelling tend to be high.
In conclusion, while travelling in isolated places can have several advantages, I believe that its disadvantages are greater

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 408, Rule ID: GOING_TO_VBD[1]
Message: 'Going to' requires the base form: 'isolate'
Suggestion: isolate
...unforgettable memory. However, going to isolated area might allow people especially scie...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15580736544 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81474376517 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538243626062 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 9.0 2.10420841683 428% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.492879105 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.65 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15899180817 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045744681552 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324505006543 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836386151009 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448518894285 0.056905535591 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.