Claim: Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
Reason: It is inappropriate—and, perhaps, even cruel—to use public resources to fund the arts when people's basic needs are not being met.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claims is based.
Art enriches human life. It has been characterized in terms of mimesis, expression, communication of emotion, or other values. That is one of the reason we love art. However, I believe there are more important essential elements to live the life in society; Food, housing, and clothing. Without these needs, we will suffer from starvation and coldness. People need government to secure these needs. I doubt that people would enjoy arts while there are many people suffering from poverty.
Poverty always has been trigger that endangers nation. For instance, the continuous Arab revolutions in 2011,...
- Most experiences in our lives that seemed difficult at the time become valuable lessons for the future 70
- 27 The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists lob 86
- 3. The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner.Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Centr 62
- 7. The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books.We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base because 90
- 4. Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, 95
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.259 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 27 15
No. of Words: 412 350
No. of Characters: 2009 1500
No. of Different Words: 231 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.505 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.876 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.513 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 145 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 100 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 61 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.259 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.588 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.407 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.26 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.404 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.062 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5