Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why?
Everyone needs money to survive, it is necessary to live the life with comforts. Nothing comes free in this world today, even for the pure drinking water we pay money. Money also provides security. We value the money because, we work hard to earn it. Giving money free to anyone creates a wrong habit. Beggars are the people who suffer from this habit. And because of that I strongly believe that we should not give money to the beggars. I will further explain the reasons in my ensuing essay.
First, getting money without doing any effort will encourage people to continue the same. Once we give money to bagger then he/she will keep doing it. Sometimes we have seen that, if people don’t give money to beggars, they start hitting or harming them. That increase the crime rate in the society. Additionally, we also do not know that beggar will use that money in the right place or not? Instead of offering money we should offer shelter or work to them. If beggar is child, it is unlawful to send a child to beg and I strongly believe that we should provide them resource for the education and shelter them at the relevant places. By doing such things we are saving them from the dark future.
Secondly, there are many frauds and rackets are going in the world related to the beggars. For example, in India people kidnap kids from the streets and sell them to the gangs. These gangs train them to be beggar and drop and pick them from the roads every day. They also beat them and harm them if they do not satisfy their needs. Such rackets are really dangerous for the safety of the society. We do not know while giving money to the beggar and unintentionally we also become part of their miserable life.
In conclusion, giving money to beggars do not help but it might put that person and society in danger. We can help them with many other things like education, shelter, food, and work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Md Lutfor Rahman | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | prayashpathak | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | Chayank_11 | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | m.h_ghasempourabadi | 71 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | ch14b18m000002 | 60 | view |
- Some people spend their entire lives in one place. Others move several times through their lives looking for a better job, house, community or even climate. Which one do you prefer? 66
- In your opinion, which modern invention or scientific discovery has affected society the most? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that the government should do to improve the health care to clean the environment? 73
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Grades encourage students to learn. Use specific example and reasons to explain your opinion. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 91, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... encourage people to continue the same. Once we give money to bagger then he/she wil...
^^^^
Line 2, column 705, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e are saving them from the dark future. Secondly, there are many frauds and rack...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53935860058 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.13922263719 2.67179642975 80% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524781341108 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0497657286 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.875 100.406767564 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2916666667 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.79166666667 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264875435201 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866905463861 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059732930042 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178837595062 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243703766403 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.1 11.7677419355 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 58.1214874552 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.46 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.002688172 45% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.