The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and womenfrom 1978 to 2008Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women
from 1978 to 2008
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant

The chart dedicates the proportion of inconsistency in income between male and female of five different countries from 1978 to 2008. Overall, the trends in Japan, US, France and UK decreased gradually, while there is an increment in Australia during the period of 30 years.
It is obvious that in 1978, the difference in income in Japan started at its highest point, nearly 50%. The figures for US, UK, France were lower, at about 33%, nearly 30% and nearly 20% respectively. In the 1978-2008 period, all these countries saw a moderate decline in the discrepancy of income among genders.
In Australia, from 1978 to 1998, the trend was also in terms of general fall along with others above. However, in the decade of 1998-2008, the Australian proportion went up and peaked at approximately 24%.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-09-11 Potato 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 136, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...rly 50%. The figures for US, UK, France were lower, at about 33%, nearly 30% and nea...
^^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tralian proportion went up and peaked at approximately 24%.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 667.0 965.302439024 69% => OK
No of words: 134.0 196.424390244 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9776119403 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.40232815919 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74554865643 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.686567164179 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 194.4 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 15.6100438625 43.030603864 36% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.2857142857 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114656295669 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565805420308 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648969872156 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0762607480656 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401015535704 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.