In some parts of the world it is becoming popular to research the history of one's own family. Why might people want to do this? Is it a positive or negative development?
In several countries, many people are increasingly conducting research regarding the origins of their own family. There are a number of reasons why this trend happens, and I believe it is a negative tendency.
To begin with, there are some reasons why individuals are interested in discovering their family's history.
The first clear reason is that these people are just curious about who their ancestors were and what role they played in society. For example, it might be interesting to find out that one's great-grandfather was once a member of the royal family. This kind of information can make people become proud of their origins.
Additionally, many people research about their family's history as this activity can serve medical purposes. For instance, they would be aware of any disease that they inherit from their relatives.
However, I would argue that this tendency is negative because of some reasons.
Firstly, as this trend does not bring about significant benefits apart from those related to health care, it can be considered a waste of time and money, especially for young individuals. In my opinion, it would better for them to focus their resources on more important things such as improving their social skills.
Secondly, the information on the history of one's family may have adverse effects on their attitude in life. To illustrate, a person with a noble origin may become arrogant, while someone who is a descendant of a criminal might be ashamed and lose his confidence.
In conclusion, researching one's own origins is becoming more common in society, and I believe this is a negative development.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-09-16 | IVANTRUONG | 56 | view |
2016-02-18 | websterpreparation | 70 | view |
2014-07-28 | skeet | 71 | view |
- Cinema attendance by age group in Great Britain. 78
- More big shopping malls are being built and replace small shops Is this a positive or negative development 84
- the drawback of having a gun in home. 40
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 47
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 45, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ndly, the information on the history of ones family may have adverse effects on thei...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 232.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.125 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79472268411 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637931034483 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8142959247 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0833333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5833333333 7.06120827912 192% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205289681261 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804457535083 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647042732711 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108412195693 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619110377132 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.